design of slope protection
this is a general design procedure for any bioengineering system. the issues involved in the design of bioengineering schemes can be complex, because of the need to consider:
- the design of both vegetative engineering systems and civil engineering
systems; and
- the relationships between systems in terms of function, physical
relationships and time. see interaction between plants and civil
engineering structures.
design aspects of bioengineering systems
1 site characteristics. make a note of the types of site situations for which
the system is appropriate. this includes material type, material drainage,
slope moisture condition, slope angle, failure mechanism and cause of failure.
2 function. this refers to the main engineering function required of the
bioengineering system, plus any secondary functions that it may perform.
3 treatments. these are the bioengineering systems that will be used
for the application.
4 hazards are inherent weaknesses of a system which cause
it to be vulnerable to specific kinds of damage. we must minimise their
impact in the design of a scheme, if necessary by avoiding the use
of the preferred system in that situation and selecting an alternative.
5 site requirements. these are conditions on site that must be present
in order for the system to be correctly applied, e.g. firm foundation conditions.
6 interactions. the relationships between the civil engineering components
and the vegetative engineering components in respect of function, space and time.
the vegetative engineering system must be integrated with the civil
engineering system in that:
- if the civil engineering component is a permanent structure, the
engineering function of the vegetation can be different from that
of the civil engineering structure;
- if the civil engineering component is a temporary structure and the
vegetation is expected to replace it, the civil engineering system must
last long enough to carry out its engineering function while the plants
are coming to maturity. In this case, the engineering function of the
plants must be the same as that of the civil engineering system.
design form for slope protection measures
| site charac-teristics |
failure mecha-nism |
cause |
function |
treat-ment |
hazards |
site require-ment |
interac-tions |
| debris. angle < 60° con-solidated. well or poorly drained |
erosion
|
surface water |
armour, catch |
grass lines, with jute net on long slopes on well-drained material |
jute may fail and pull of grass |
not too rocky or bouldery |
with jute: grass takes over from jute |
| rocky debris |
erosion |
surface water |
catch |
horizontal bolsters with trees below on long, well-drained slopes |
bolsters can be under-mined. fitting causes slope distur-bance |
as above |
structure protects plants at first, then plants support bolster |
| slide |
surface water |
support, drain |
herring-bone bolsters with trees below on poorly-drained and wet slopes. bamboos or large trees at base |
as above |
as above |
as above |
| ground water |
drain |
shrub planting |
|
not so rocky that shrubs cannot live |
none |
| hard rock. superfi-cial detach-ment from rock slopes and surfaces |
plane failure |
weather-ing |
limited application; minor failures only: catch |
few systems available. wire net, catch fence |
|
|
none |
| armour? |
breast wall, render-ing. |
cause continues & pushes armour off |
|
none |
| Support - for a few situations |
Tree propping of boulders |
|
|
none |
| soft rock of any kind |
erosion |
weather-ing plus surface water |
No solution yet.
Catch debris? |
No solution yet. Vegeta-tion cannot live |
|
|
|
| hard rock |
slide |
ground water |
drain?
support |
spring catcher. french drain tree prop-ping? |
in time, rock may weather and break up around tree |
water comes from one spot. ground will accept french drain
rock suffi-ciently integral to take propping. soil suitable for growth |
none
none |
| perme-able siwalik sand-stone >50° |
disinte-gration |
weather-ing |
no solution yet. (armour or support in short term) |
no solution as yet. cut back to stable angle; possibly seed & jute net |
cover tends to slide off when mature |
probably slope less than 40° |
plants take over from jute net |
hard & soft rock layers.
rock slopes >60° |
differen-tial weather-ing |
weather-ing and erosion of soft rock, followed by plane failure of hard rock |
support (plus armour) |
prop walls |
perma-nence depends on strength of hard layers |
hard beds for good founda-tion. accep-table spacing and orienta-tion of rock planes |
none |

design of surface and subsurface drainage
design form for surface water drainage measures
| site characte-ristics |
failure me-chanism |
cause |
function |
treatment |
hazards |
site require-ment |
interac-tions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
design aspects of bioengineering surface
water drainage measures
| site charac-teristics |
failure me-chanism |
cause |
function |
treat-ment |
hazards |
site require-ment |
interac-tions |
| debris on hill slopes up to 40° |
erosion |
surface water |
drain, catch and armour |
earth ditch with bund (<5° side slope). grasses above, on bund and below |
erosion, blockage, leakage into the ground. difficult to maintain without damaging ditch |
foundation must be firm and stable. ground water must be absent. ground must be soft enough to excavate |
plants protect structure |
| bound masonry ditch, with grasses above and below, or shrub barrier below |
erosion along edges, blockage, cracking, undermining |
presence of suitable material for foundations |
plants protect structure. plants improve performance of structure by trapping debris above |
| ca-scade, with stone pitching outside and grasses beyond, possibly shrubs |
erosion along edges, water jumping over cascade |
presence of suitable material for foundations |
plants protect structure |
installation of cut-off ditches or catch drains above cuttings
cut-off ditches, otherwise known as cut-off drains or catch drains are:
- almost certain to become blocked;
- very likely to suffer from settlement of the foundations and crack as a result;
- often difficult to inspect because they are above the road.
a cut-off ditch becoming blocked or cracked is a common cause of a landslide or the severe erosion of a cutting in Nepal. damage to a cutting can be considered the usual outcome of the installation of a cut-off ditch.
this warning applies to all surface ditches and therefore they are best avoided. water should be brought down the slope along its natural course, protected with vegetation, and if possible carried into the nearest roadside ditch by a cascade. localised damage can then be seen and repaired as soon as it occurs.
design form for surface water drainage measures
| site characte-ristics |
failure me-chanism |
cause |
function |
treatment |
hazards |
site require-ment |
interac-tions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
design aspects of bioengineering for sub-surface
drainage measures
| site characte-ristics |
failure me-chanism |
cause |
function |
treatment |
hazards |
site require-ment |
interac-tions |
| debris |
slide |
surface water |
drain |
gabion bolster with shrubs below. |
under-mining, mass move-ment deeper in slope. |
almost any site without exces-sive amount of stones, espe-cially colluvial slopes |
structure protects plants early in their life. when the plants mature they protect the structure. |
| ground water |
drain |
french drain with grass or shrubs along edges. drain can be made more resistant to disrup-tion by building it in a casing of gabion. |
blockage cannot be detected. piping may occur under-ground. |
almost any site with slope <45 degrees without excessive amount of stones |
plants protect the structure. |

design of gully protection works
location of check dams
i 1. check dams are used to prevent gully erosion. discuss with your
partner how they do this and write down your answer.
2. examine the drawing of the gully floor profile shown below. decide
on suitable locations for check dams for this gully.

gully cross-section before check dam
produce a sketch design for a check dam elevation for this gully cross-section.
you do not have to provide exact dimensions, nor do you have to choose the type of check dam.
be specific about the shape of the upper edge of the check dam, the dimensions of the key into the gully sides and the depth of the foundation.

longitudinal profile of gully head
produce a sketch design for a civil engineering solution to stabilise this gully head profile.
you do not have to provide exact dimensions. no specific type of structure is required if you choose to incorporate on.
you must be specific about the type of solution you propose.

vegetative engineering design for gullies
1 the gully cross-section, after a checkdam has been installed, is shown
below. produce a sketch design for bioengineering measures to keep
this new cross-section stable.
2 working with your proposal for civil engineering works to stabilise
the gully head:
a prepare a sketch design for supplementary bioengineering
measures to keep the whole gully head stable;
b note the structural engineering functions being performed
by the vegetative works;
c briefly describe the interactions, if any, between the vegetative
works and the civil engineering works.

design principles for bioengineering systems in gullies
1 longitudinal profile of gully
over the 100 m section of gully, there are three favourable locations for check dams. these are shown in the sketch below.

location A is a 'nick point' in the gully floor, a point where the floor drops down suddenly after a relatively gentle gradient. a check dam positioned here will hold up material for a long way upstream and further reduce the gradient. this particular nick point is composed of material, which is softer than the sandstone bed. the slope below the check dam would need to be very well protected with an apron to prevent scour of the nick point and undermining of the check dam. the higher the check dam, the greater is the need for scour prevention.
location B is a deposit of debris lying in the bed of the gully. flowing water will move this downstream. a check dam placed at the front of this debris pile will prevent it from moving further. this will have the effect of reducing the gradient of the gully floor and protecting it from scour. the danger then is that the stream will wander sideways and scour the bank, as discussed under the gully cross-section, below.
location C is an outcrop of a harder bed of rock in the gully floor, producing another nick point. a check dam can be built here for the same reason as at location A. however, an alternative would be to take advantage of the presence of a good foundation and simply armour the nick point against scour with a masonry lining on the gully floor
2 cross section of gully
a check dam should have a top profile that encourages the water to flow through the centre, not near the ends, where it will scour the gully sides and possibly expose the extremities of the check dam. the ends should be keyed at least 0.5 m into the bank at each side, and a similar depth into the floor. masonry check dams should have weep holes at the base as well as all the way up.

note that water flowing over a check dam to the left or right of centre can strike the sidewalls of the gully on the downstream side. this will cause undercutting and scour. planting and stone pitching should be laid to prevent this.
debris halted in its path by a check dam often comes to rest in a convex heap, causing the stream to flow along the edges of the debris, against the bank. the stream can scour the bank, widening the gully and bringing very large quantities of debris into the bed. this situation is even more difficult to deal with than a V-notch cross section. however, it is a consequence of installing check dams and it must be considered in the design of schemes. bioengineering measures must be added along the lower gully sides. resilient shrubs such as simali (Vitex negundo) are probably best for this, as they resist partial burial and battering by rocks. they have good root systems to resist scour, by armouring the surface, and to support the bank, and they trap or catch debris. they should be planted when the check dams are being installed, to allow them to grow as large as possible before they are called upon to resist moving debris. if the stream starts to undercut the banks very actively, guide walls can be considered in addition to a programme of planting.
the top of the gully sides can be smoothed off into the surrounding hill side and the whole planted with grasses. the gully side slopes can be protected with shrubs and small trees, especially at the base, where support will be needed. grass can be used on the middle part of the slope.
3 stabilisation of a gully head
gully heads tend to fall in periodically, bringing large amounts of debris into the channel. the steep headwall can be reduced by rounding it off into the hillside and building a check dam to retain the debris and keep the gradient low. the check dam must be very substantial, and properly drained. trees, shrubs and grasses can be planted to minimise erosion. trees placed at the foot of the original slope should provide support at that point.
the area below the check dam is vulnerable. if the volume of water is low, the gully floor can be planted with shrubs to reduce scour and trap debris, forming a natural apron. if scour is likely to be strong, a dry pitched stone or masonry apron should be installed, with plants below on the downstream edge.
|
|
|